Smoke Eaters

smoke eaters

This is my second brief post about reading for the Planetary Awards.  The February 14th deadline is almost here, so don’t forget to make your own nominations.  Yesterday, I posted about Embers of War and why it wouldn’t get my nomination.  Today, I’m posting about Smoke Eaters and why it won’t, either.

Firefighters versus dragons is a fun premise.  I enjoyed the characters and storyline of the novel, and can’t remember any boring parts that lost my attention.  That makes it sound like Smoke Eaters should be on my nomination short list, and it would be, except … the author apparently has a problem with religious people, and felt compelled to insert anti-religious diatribes in an otherwise enjoyable story.

First, a male religious character (who seems to have no purpose in the story other than to make religious people look bad) has an adulterous affair.  When the woman later dies during a dragon attack, he is distraught, and joins the ministry quickly enough to be the pastor at the woman’s funeral, where he announces the affair and starts a fistfight with the woman’s husband.  In case this example didn’t convince you that all religious people are horrible, the main character then has an internal monologue to tell you so.  The author needed to both show us and tell us this important piece of information, despite it having nothing to do with firefighters or dragons.

In Smoke Eaters, Canadians are so concerned with endangered species that the entire nation starts worshiping dragons — dragons that have turned most of the Earth’s surface into an apocalyptic wasteland.  Environmentalism is pretty much a religion with many people these days, but I don’t think that particular religion would last through homes being burned and family members being eaten.  What makes no sense in the book is this new religion adopting negative elements of past religions, from the self-flagellation of medieval Catholicism to the human sacrifice of ancient societies.  Once again, the author takes the opportunity to both show us that religion is evil and worthless, and then outright tell us so via internal monologue.

Normally, I would have picked up the sequel to this book right away.  Now, I don’t think there’s any discount level deep enough that I’d be willing to bite.  I expect to turn on the news and see reporters, Hollywood actors, and university professors spewing hate at me for my religious beliefs.  I don’t expect to spend my time and money on a book and receive the same treatment.  Sci-fi/fantasy authors, you don’t have that many readers left.  You can’t afford to piss all over a large percentage of them.


  1. Many “woke” authors seem not to realize that the very people they are preaching to won’t be buying their books anyway. The people who DO buy books, on a regular basis, are the very ones the “woke author” is hating one.

    I think it proves that authors like that aren’t actually trying to tell a story but preach their “wokeness” to the backwards hicks in flyover country. Sigh…

    1. Funny thing is, this guy’s from Arkansas. Maybe he just needed to get his book through the publishing company’s system, or maybe he had an axe to grind.

      The characters were an exaggerated diversity squad, although the main character was an older white male, which annoyed a number of female reviewers on your favorite website, goodreads.

      1. Ahh, he’s the pointman for a “woke invasion” of flyover country!

        Eh, devilreads is big enough that somebody is going to get offended about something, every….single….time….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: