Review: Adam

Adam


Flying SaucerFlying SaucerFlying Saucer

Three flying saucers
(3 out of 4 rating)

Fellow blogger Justine Allen has been a frequent visitor here, so I made sure to include some of her work in my latest reading binge. I’m glad I did so; I was reading a long string of stories which didn’t really go anywhere (not bad enough to trash, but not good enough to recommend, just collections of sentences which made forgettable stories), and this work of Justine’s gave me the break I needed. I’m going to try a spoiler-free review; let me know in the comments section if this makes my writing too vague.

I started to call this story dystopian, but then I realized that for some people, the world it presents would be utopian. This led me to think quite a bit about how many people you could actually have in a utopia before it was no longer a utopia for some. My vision of utopia has even changed over my lifetime. When I was younger, I wanted to be constantly mobile, exploring the world and having adventures. Now that I’ve done that, I want the Leave It to Beaver life. Okay, I can’t actually remember the TV show, but I want the stereotype it represents, which would have been a stagnant prison to my younger self.

One of the intriguing things about the dys-utopia in Adam is that most of the people there entered voluntarily, which isn’t how people typically end up in a dystopia. I really liked how many of the residents of the society were pressured to enter it in the name of resource scarcity. Although I don’t think the form of pressure was specified, I can imagine all kinds of possibilities: peer pressure, government taxes/penalties, forgiveness of crimes…

Adam, the title character, entered the dys-utopia in a different manner than most of its inhabitants; the story doesn’t specify whether he was the only one to enter in this manner, or simply the last. To me, he didn’t play a large enough role in the story; I would have liked to see him develop enhanced abilities due to his method of entry, or to have a grudge against the society and be responsible for its downfall.

This story was written for a competition with a low word-count limit, and I would like to see it rewritten as a longer work, possibly even a novella or novel. The ending has some intriguing twists and turns, which are told to the reader rather than “shown” through character experiences or dialogue. I think the telling format was inevitable; any other way of expressing the concepts would have increased the word count immensely. Ultimately, I was surprised to get several thought-provoking ideas from the same story; I never felt like I wasted my 99 cents.

Advertisements

5 comments

  1. Nice to see you back in fine form! I think the level of detail in your review is working well. šŸ™‚

    1. Thanks Sue! I’m going to try to post at least once per week for the next several months.

  2. This is a nice, concise review, PDC. You included just enough to pique my interest. Thanks:)

  3. Eek! Thanks PDC – what a fantastic review. Yup, the 1500 word limit was a bit of a nightmare, hence telling more than showing. Love the idea of novel or novella!

  4. […] Fresh Start: This story, like another I recently reviewed, might make you think about what your personal utopia would look like, and might also make you […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: